driverless cars
The article here introduces the topic of driverless cars. The author says that driverless cars will have a positive impact on the human beings. The lecturer disagrees. He says that the driverless cars will not have a positive impact on humanity as pointed by the author and thereby attack the claims made by the author.
Firslty, the author says that driverless cars will reduce the traffic adccidents as most of the accidents are caused by human error. The author provides an example of a technology company which has a self-driving car that has driven over 700,000 miles without an accident. The lecturer refutes the claims made by the author. He says that the computer software which is used in driverless cars is designed by humans after all so it might be potential to human errors. So any automation system is prone to human errors as it is designed by the humans. He further points out that the example about the driverless car which the author talked about; it hit another car and met with an accident last month which was all over the news.
Secondly, the author says that driverless cars will be good for the environement and it will reduce pollution. He gives the reason that since driverless cars will eliminate the human dependency, it can communicate with other cars thereby reducing traffic problem and can also run the engine more efficiently than humans. The lectures disagrees with this point. He says that instead of reducing pollution, self-driving cars might contribute to increasing pollution. Once driverless cars are available, more people will drive these cars which will increase the total number of cars. For the driverless cars, requirement of driving license will also be removed, so the age restriction for driving will be removed thereby increasing total numbers of cars. He says that due to increase in the total number of cars, the advantages of engine efficiency will be not be relevant for self-driving cars and it will contribute in increasing the pollution.
Thirdly, the author says that after the advent of driverless cars, passanger's time will be saved. While driving, people will be able to focus on other important things like reading, watching videos or catching up on work. The lecturer refutes this claim and points out that to many people driving is actually relaxing. Listening to music/radio while driving or just driving can be distractions from the routine life and the driverless cars aim to abolish that. With the advent of driverless cars, people will instead use the time saved by working or just wasting their time or just doing what we do every day in routine life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | KnockingOn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | ishitakush.08 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | rassata | 75 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | rassata | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | Shubham Patel | 90 | view |
- The city of Winston has two large department stores Namen and Roscoe Namen is known for its high end designer fashions while Roscoe is known for more affordable fashion options Both Namen and Roscoe are each considering opening another store in the growin 58
- The most important education occurs not during adult hood but during childhood Agree or not agree 70
- Easter island population 73
- Essay topics Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth century In recent years however the sale of fossils particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates has grown i 73
- Ecocertification 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... a positive impact on the human beings. The lecturer disagrees. He says that the dr...
^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'disagree'.
Suggestion: disagree
...e efficiently than humans. The lectures disagrees with this point. He says that instead o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 5.04856512141 396% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1373.03311258 160% => OK
No of words: 441.0 270.72406181 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96598639456 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58433574529 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433106575964 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 673.2 419.366225166 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5812134217 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5454545455 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0454545455 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.59090909091 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384909004107 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147234901377 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121100888035 0.0662205650399 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282117646437 0.162205337803 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646535610591 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.