The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph compares global water usage of three sectors, namely agriculture, industry, and domestics. The table shows water consumed by two different countries in the year 2000.
It is clear that agriculture used the most water among three sectors. Also, Brazil consumed much more water than Democratic Republic of Congo.
According to the line graph, agriculture is the primary source of global water use among three sectors and its figure increased dramatically from 500 in 1990 to 3000 in 2000. The equivalent figures for both industrial use and domestic use remained stable between 1990 to 1950. Meanwhile, both of them witnessed an increase to 1500 and 500 respectively over the following four years.
We could see that the amount of population, irrigated land and water consumption per person in Brazil overtook those figures of Congo in 2000. The amount of Brazilian population was over 30 times as large as that of Congo. Similarly, their water consumption per person was 359 m^3 and 8 m^3, respectively. A more huge gap existed in the amount of irrigated land and there was 26500 km^2 land which is irrigated in Brazil, while only 100 km^2 in Congo.
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 11
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71544715447 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38104529435 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544715447154 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5859695021 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8571428571 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.