The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015. Units are given in percentages.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph represents the percentage of working age population in France, United States, Japan and Germany.
What stands out from the graph is that people who are in working age in four countries mentioned are getting closer and closer to the age of retiring throughout the period surveyed.
Starting at about 67%, the rate of Americans in working age was the highest in comparison with the other three countries in 1960. The figure for the USA declined slightly in the first 10 years, which was followed by an increasing trend to about 68% in 1990 before expecting to its all time low of next 60 years. Following that was the Japanese. Between 1960 to 1990, the was a considerable surge in the proportion of working people in Japan from 65% to about 69%, but later it is predicted to fall significantly to about 52% in 2050.
With a reference to the two left countries with fewer working adults than the other two. The data of France and Germany both witnessed a sharp growth from 1960 to 2010 and then is projected to plunge significantly to 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | Giang Tran | 44 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 78
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 84
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table and chart below show the domestic water use and cost in 5 countries 67
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66310160428 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56054261958 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3784117951 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191156527437 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078952312767 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563381016112 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112889851463 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154730540878 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.