The bar chart showcases the three countries in Europe with their milk trading between 2008 and 2012.
Overall, within the bar chart, Russia dominated the biggest export range and to contrary, Italy had a stable result during the years. However, there is Poland indicated the lowest tonnage of export.
The main changes involve the Russian milk export because the figures started up at 24 milliontonnagese in 2008 and there is no comparable country to Russia. The trademarks increased slightly by 38 in 2009 and the numbers peaked at 40 in 2010. The tonnes of sending abroad declined dramatically to 34 and 28 in 2011 and 2012.
The other notable alterations are stability in Italy during all years. Initially, the numbers accounted for17 in 2008. In 2009, the range of exports remained relatively stable same as in 2008. The numbers escalated at a reasonable rate to nearly 20 in 2010. Then, in 2011 and 2012, the figures only went up to 20 and 21 tonnages. When it comes to Poland, the export range commenced at 13 in 2008, but, it diminished to 7 in 2009. The worst results are shown in 2010 with 5.5. Afterward, there was a decrease in numbers in 2011 to 13 tonnage. Finally, the ratio of export finished in 2012 with 14 million tons.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- The Chart Below shows the milk export figures from three European countries between 2008 and 2012 Task 1 essay a barchat 75
- Many doctors recommend that older people exercise regularly but most patients do not follow an exercise routine Why do you think this happens How can people be encouraged to exercise regularly 61
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- write a report describing the info below The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...9 and the numbers peaked at 40 in 2010. The tonnes of sending abroad declined drama...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ally to 34 and 28 in 2011 and 2012. The other notable alterations are stability...
^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts remained relatively stable same as in 2008. The numbers escalated at a reasona...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7465437788 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57273309823 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594470046083 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7561883313 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5714285714 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21428571429 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238784450624 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772960297804 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832120657883 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168060693068 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922089354012 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.