Nowadays, the trend of organising large and high-priced marriage ceremonies is increasing. This is majorly because of the pressure of maintaining social status and increasing gathering culture. Although it is once in lifetime experience, it imposes financial burden on middle class families which is largely detrimental for the society.
The predominant reason to hold a big-sized celebration is the influence of the society. People are running in a race to flaunt their wealth. To be clearer, if someone organizes a big wedding party, other people who have attended the event are expected to have even a bigger party. This Is nothing but the measurement of one's standard of living and on that basis, people treat others in the society. Moreover, the grander the celebration, the more respectable they become. Besides this, with the growing social media trend, people love to gather occasionally and share pictures on digital platforms and showcase their designer clothes, jewellery, makeup and venue. Because of these two reasons, the exorbitant celebrations are increasing.
This phenomenon affects families financially. This is because 70 percent of individuals belong to a middle class family and they are unable to afford lavish parties; however, the societal pressure makes them to take loans and throw a grand party. As a result, it increases financial challenges for them and it becomes a herculean task to even survive. Not only financially but the stress of repaying debts also adversely affects physical and mental well-being. According to a 2015 survey, 68% of individuals are suffering from clinical depression owing to financial burden. However, the relevance of having memories cannot be overlooked. Money can be earned throughout life but marriage is a life time experience which is more important than funds.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that the parties are getting bigger due to maintaining social class and flaunting on digital media; however, it is building stress of repaying loans and affecting individuals' health.
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages Give reasons for your answ 95
- Some people think that in the modern world we have become more dependent on each other while others think that people are now more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people say that the current level of air travel is acceptable where as other people believe air travel should be reduced and the government should play a role in this Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 92
- In some countries young people are living in richer and healthier condition but less happy What are the reasons What might be done to solve this issue 84
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate school Others however believe that girls and boys benefit more from attending mixed schools Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... This Is nothing but the measurement of ones standard of living and on that basis, p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to lavish'
Suggestion: to lavish
...ss family and they are unable to afford lavish parties; however, the societal pressure...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 693, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...arned throughout life but marriage is a life time experience which is more important than...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... stress of repaying loans and affecting individuals health.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44200626959 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90714114208 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6944039992 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0518633556344 0.244688304435 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0140569732546 0.084324248473 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0237056258664 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0285539157342 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176240669573 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.