Nowadays weddings are becoming bigger and more expensive. Why is it happening? Is it a negative or a positive development?
In the era of fashion and compensation, people more tend to splendid and luxurious wedding ceremony. Presently, people become better off, and they spend their money to celebrate their traditions to make their status powerful in society. It seems mostly damage to our environment as well as our society of common people.
Nowadays people more use their money and time in enjoyment and celebration. Destination wedding is the first choice of today's youth. Bank also provide loan to celebrate marriage, if people do not afford the expense at the same time. Later, this may lead stress for pay off the loan within time limit. Moreover, costly wedding is just a trend now, no matter people afford or not. Parents of girl have had a lot of pressure and tension whole life for this ceremony. So, it is compulsion of common people which leads crime, health issues, unhealthy competition for show-off and cause numerous damage to the society.
Presently, the wealthy people arrange mega wedding ceremony at the natural beauty places and ancient palaces. Such huge wedding causes serious harm to the environment by leave footprint in pristine place. It produces bulk waste. To adorn the place, people use artificial and plastic products. Human leave their footprint where they go. However, people enjoy food, hospitality, custom in the expensive wedding. But there are many options to make simple, enjoyable and eco friendly wedding.
To conclude, it is clear that people should have to control to spending their money on marriages and try to make ceremony as simple as possible to reduce the detrimental effect on the earth and our society.
- Many people believe that family has a greater influence on a child’s life and development compared to other factors, such as friends, TV, music and so on. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Nowadays weddings are becoming bigger and more expensive Why is it happening Is it a negative or a positive development 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10780669145 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51106367424 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617100371747 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5054865968 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3333333333 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9444444444 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0741192823593 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255356423198 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369003468038 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0425039423026 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028024365988 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.