Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to take risks and explore new things when you are older rather than when you are younger.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Being adventurous is human nature but might not suit people of different ages the same. I believe that older people are more suited for taking risks and exploring new things.
First, older people's experience enables them to explore new things safely. Living more years gives older people more opportunities to face emergent situations and hence practice how to tackle such emergencies wisely. Although this is not to say that younger people are incapable of doing so, they lack the sophistication when dealing with these problems, especially ones that will put them in grave danger. For example, while sophisticated people might remain calm and not provoke wildlife during exploration trips in the backcountry, younger people might react aggressively, endangering the beast and themselves. Some of the encounters can be life-threatening, especially when dangerous animals, such as grizzly bears, are involved, putting younger people at higher risks than older people with more experience.
Second, older people can afford the expenses and the time needed for adventures. Typically, risky explorations involve buying expensive equipment and paying for costly transportation. And such journeys can take weeks or even months. But most young people are either students or full-time employees who lack the time and money to carry out their adventures. So, doing these can create much burden on their already stressful lives. Comparatively, older people have most likely saved up a considerable amount of money during their career or, sometimes, are on pensions. So, they can afford expensive trips to far-away places where most explorations end up. And if they are retired, they would also have almost unlimited holidays to do things that would take a long time. Therefore, risky explorations are less of a burden on them than younger people.
To conclude, living longer offers older people the experience to adventure safely and allows them to have the money and leisure to do so.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets dogs cats or other animals although there are better uses for their money 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets dogs cats or other animals although there are better uses for their money 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television shows made in foreign countries are usually more interesting and popular than those made in our home countries 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world today is just so busy and crowded we should not expect people to be polite to one another 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
..., endangering the beast and themselves. Some of the encounters can be life-threatening, esp...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38585209003 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80244219221 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591639871383 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6906250558 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5294117647 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143721879472 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532402527609 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452824911204 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882353106611 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337290887792 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.