AUSTRALIAN SECONDARY SCHOOL GRADUATES STEREOTYPES
The piecharts indicate the percentage of graduates of secondary school who were unemployed, employed or moved up to further education in Australia over the period of 20 years.
The initial impression from the charts is that the rate of Australia’s pupil graduating from secondary school and going straight to further studies declined significantly during the whole stage. By contrast, the number of Australian secondary school graduates who applied for a job experience an upward trend over the period shown.
In 1980, most of the graduates in Australia’s secondary school went to further education, which was fivefold in comparison with the jobless in Australia. However, this figure was less than the proportion of graduates in Australia’s secondary school that are employed in 1990 and 2000. Meanwhile, starting at 40% in 1980 and then roaring in 2000, the employed after graduating secondaryc school was accounted for the highest percentage.
Referring to the unemployed graduates in Australia, the number of that surged minimally between 1980 and 1990, but later fell sharply over the last 10 years and took up the lowest percentage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 84
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers Do you agree or disagree 73
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 78
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42458100559 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95039775537 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586592178771 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.7091216408 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 138.714285714 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356838955937 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182254341362 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726077583526 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208445778418 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101754167853 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.