The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050. Units are given in percentages.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph provides information about the rate of people working age in 4 countries over 90 years from 1960 to 2050.
Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of working people witnessed, fluctuated in all countries between 1960 and 2020. morover, the trends of 4 countries were continued to fall during 40 years from 2010 to 2050.
Looking at the chart for more details, it can be seen that the figure for German workers had the highest point in 1960, more than 65%. but then it had a fluctuate from 1970 to 1990. finally it reduced significantly over 60 years later, at 55%. the similar was true for japan, starting at 65% and then it continued to progress about 70%, which the highest data of the chart, like in germany, but then the percentage will be decreased sharply in 2050.
Turning to these 2 others, the rate of workforce in France and united states progressed gradually from 1960 to 1990, but then it may be continued to decline in the next 60 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | htngyen | view | |
| 2023-07-26 | htngyen | view | |
| 2023-03-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 73
- The table and chart below show the domestic water use and cost in 5 countries 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Morover
...in all countries between 1960 and 2020. morover, the trends of 4 countries were continu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...e highest point in 1960, more than 65%. but then it had a fluctuate from 1970 to 19...
^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...in 1960, more than 65%. but then it had a fluctuate from 1970 to 1990. finally it reduced s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...n it had a fluctuate from 1970 to 1990. finally it reduced significantly over 60 years ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: finally,
...n it had a fluctuate from 1970 to 1990. finally it reduced significantly over 60 years ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nificantly over 60 years later, at 55%. the similar was true for japan, starting at...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, may, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43032541703 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577142857143 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6641823678 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191632842276 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844225232199 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491147336332 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126208153168 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497465791981 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.