Computers are being used more and more in education and so there will soon be no role for the teacher in education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern age of this era, the advent of computers is becoming omnipresent in education, thus resulting in concerns about the elimination of supervisors in the offing. However, I wholeheartedly disagree with the given statement that will be analyzed with some highlighted ideas.
To begin with, the future curriculum will expect a remodelling of scholars to be comparable with training assistants. It is a stereotype for students to be passive while learning, since this method shows little practical effect in improving their academic performances in higher levels. Learning how to harness questions that are open to interpretation by teachers helps them embrace the ability to absorb in studies and develop logical thinking. For instance, in prestigious universities like Harvard, self-learning is one of the most common factors that constitute a great proportion of its well-qualified education. Based on given clues or reviews from the professors, pupils therefore are capable of tackling discovered problems or improving presentation skills during their terms.
Secondly, computers are too pompous to uplift the studying atmosphere. Teachers can integrate their own stories to arouse excitement and turn lessons into more compelling ones. On the other hand, learning through computers seems to concentrate deeper on hypotheses. If students confront conundrums that are out of their depth, for example, they may find it cumbersome and grow more despondent in schooling. What is more, these soft skills refine the way scholars interact with learners so that they can understand the mindset of each individual, which enables them to build goodwill and long-term motivation.
To summerize, teachers are an essential part of education and can not be excluded easily in the growth of advanced technology. I strongly believe that in the near future, their role will be emphasized much more as well as being able to cooperate with computers for better educational qualification.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-02 | polar bear | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-04 | overlordka1508 | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | Nguyen Thi Van | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | aikzat | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...their role will be emphasized much more as well as being able to cooperate with co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54934210526 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08540532531 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7213028314 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282544552832 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815209067741 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079150197518 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169472067145 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106182933435 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.