There are various people living on the earth. Some people have broad knowledge of many academic subjects and some people specialize in one specific subject. Out of these, I think the people who specialize in one specific subject are the best. I will tell you three reasons to support my opinion.
First, if you are good in the one subject, you can easy to determine your dream. Many students have difficulty finding their dreams in school. Therefore, many students come to college and find their dreams and prepare for them, so they are often delayed. However, if you are good at a particular field form an early age, you do not have to worry about this and you can find your dream right away and preaprare it to reach success faster. For example, my friend is very good at dance, so she everyday go to dance academy from four years, now she’s dance skill is just like dancer. I think maybe she will become a famous dancer in the future.
Second, you can be a top in that field. Usually, people who are talented in many fields care about many fields, so it is difficult to succed in one field. However, if you work hard on one major, you can be a expert on that field. Actually, my friend for other subjects are medium, but she is very good at math, so students are called math king. Students always ask her if they have hard probelm. Therefore, if you excel in one fiedl like this, you will be recognized by people.
Like this, if you excel in one field, you can find your dream quickly and your chances of success are high. I have never seen a genuis who is good at everthing. That is why I think it is better to grow up to excel in one field.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Boys and girls should attend separate schools Use specific reasons and examples to support you answer 87
- The world’s forests are facing increasing pressure which, if left unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation 73
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line The vessel was about 2 200 years old Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod The 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 100
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d is very good at dance, so she everyday go to dance academy from four years, now...
^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... you work hard on one major, you can be a expert on that field. Actually, my frie...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.34951456311 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16596020879 2.67179642975 81% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504854368932 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4131418242 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7368421053 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2631578947 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275384567793 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905835840485 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094859155286 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186278426242 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911059401595 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 11.7677419355 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.65 10.9000537634 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 86.8835125448 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.