The line graph illustrates the average monthly number of workers in the UK going to the office every day by three different means of transport from 1970 to 2030.
It can be seen clearly from the graph that the number of commuters using cars and trains increased dramatically, opposited to buses experiencing a downward trend.
In 1970, the number of cars and trains used was nearly 5 millions and 2 millions respectively. There was a stable remain in the number of commuters using cars in 1980, however, these figures rose gradually between 1980 and 2000, approximately 7 millions. The number of workers travelling by car hit a peak 9% in the end of the period. Besides, the number of trains used by commuters climbed slightly 3 millions over the period of 30 years. There was a minor increase in the number of workers travelling by trains from 2010 to 2020,and reaching 5 millions in 2030.
In the first of the period, the number of commuters travelling by buses rated second with nearly 4 millions. By contrast, these figures show a slight decrease in 2030, at 3 millions.
- Nowadays people have little awareness of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 67
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80213903743 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70777342978 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524064171123 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0353346182 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382132569344 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153663254984 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043163847148 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211215818549 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466092191666 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.