The line graph indicates the manufacture of paper, wood pulp and sawn wood in the United Kingdom between 1980 and 2000.
In general, the output of paper and packaging started with 230 million tonnages in 1980 and this number is the highest in 1980. Respectively, sawn wood and wood pulp had various and lower figures than the former section.
In terms of industry of paper and packaging escalated to 250 million tonnages in 1990 because of demands. When comes to 2000, the tons of trade increased dramatically to 350 million tonnages as a result of the types of labor developed during these years. If we compare it with sawn wood, there was a decline in production after 1980.
The other changes involve sawn wood and wood pulp. In 1980, the industry of sawn-wood commenced with 200 and during 1990 and 2000, there was a sharp decline in creation with 150 million tonnages in 1990 and then, 130 million tonnages in 2000. Wood pulp showcased 160 million tonnes of production in 1980. Thereon, the numbers are shown same the same results as the making of sawn wood in 1990. Finally, the production of wood pulp had 140 million tonnages in 2000.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- write a report describing the info below The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 61
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 73
- Homelessness is increasing in many major cities around the world What do you think are the main causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36643191324 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5848288829 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5454545455 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448372470988 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217548577503 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139146243518 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3313717151 0.15604864568 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133228340275 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.