Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree?
Salary and job contentment is a vital issue for not only workers but also firms. A wide range of people suppose that a great emolument is more crucial than gladdening in work. In my perspective, however, I believe satisfaction also plays an indispensable part in a profession. Hence, I am partly in favor of the viewpoint that emphasizes a high pay over job pleasure.
On the one hand, the cruciality of salary is indisputable. Firstly, a huge income would assure an adequate standard of living, including food sufficiency, all-around education and well-being. For instance, an abundant amount of money assists in purchasing clean and nutritious foodstuffs asserting a healthy lifestyle, likewise, it also helps children to study at high-ranking schools. Secondly, a high-paid occupation can elevate self-honor since someone with a massive level of earnings is commonly assumed to be talented.
On the other hand, to the best of my knowledge, a big salary only brings immediate benefits as individuals working in office need to take pleasure in doing their careers. Initially, job contentment could contribute to reducing stress, not to mention promoting creativity and productivity. This is by virtue of fewer physiological and psychological affairs, employees have capacity to generate more wonderful ideas. To illustrate, numerous individuals earn a myriad of money, yet their monotonous occupations put them under enormous pressures and limit their potentials. Furthermore, gladdening in profession creates a healthy and dynamic workspace in light that company staffs feel more pleasant and enthusiastic in their career, they may establish harmonious relationships with other workmates, besides, there will rise more discussions among the peers, thereby it leads to the improvement of work efficiency.
In conclusion, I regard that a satisfactory emolument and pleasure in occupation would form a perfect career, and thus both should be equally concerned in order to gain long-term advantages for workers and entrepreneurs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-27 | bassmodulators123 | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | TLan168 | 11 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57281553398 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25326270483 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4268444818 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135708769021 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433740468919 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384387925786 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679133170516 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607712208374 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.