IELTS WRITING TASK 1 BAR CHART
The bar chart illustrates how the intermediate real estate payment changed in fived various cities over the world from 1990 to 2002 measured with the changed in 1989.
It can be seen from the chart that Frankfurt (Germany) had the higher change between 1990 and 1995 while London (UK) had the percentage of prices higher than the other countries from 1996 to 2002. In addition, the house's cost in London (UK) witnessed the most significant change in comparison to the other four cities in four different countries.
According to the chart, during in the 1990-1995 there was a significant decreased in three cities: -5% for New York (USA), around -6% for Tokyo (Japan) and approximately -6% for London (UK). Whereas, Madrid (Spain) and Frankfurt (Germany) increased slightly, at about 1% and 1.5%.
In the next period was 1996-2002 saw Tokyo (Japan) had minimal increase at -5% in comparison to the 1990-1995 period. Whereas, decreased remarkably in compared with 1989 prices. Beside that in Frankfurt (Germany) went down slowly by 1%. There was a slight difference in the other three countries. In New York (USA) increased substantially by 5%, in Madrid (Spain) went up mildly around 4%. Specially, London (UK) had the dramatical growth around 11%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-04 | phuong cao | 11 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | hieudayy | view | |
| 2023-08-29 | Afdalah Harris | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | serebi2704 | 71 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- Task 2 Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 78
- WRITING TASK 1 CHILDREN S CHARITY SPENT AND RECEIVED 61
- WRITING TASK 1 IELTS BAR CHART 11
- Task 2 Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- WRITING TASK 1 LINE GRAPH AVERAGE CO2 EMISSIONS PER PERSON 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in comparison to the 1990-1995 period. Whereas, decreased remarkably in compared with ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00975609756 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62958050547 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565853658537 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0444628739 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3636363636 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0733048670508 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237113976262 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391144519154 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506896278995 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517602777749 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.