A nation should require all of it's students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
When we are in school, we are naive. Students often confuse themselves while choosing between what they like and what they found the best option. Studies are not different. There are always the subjects or field that attracts you, that you fancy. However, we often tempering those choices with what we know are more acceptable and famous carrer choices. We as student often try to follow a path that has definite success. I do believe that if students get a rigid curriculum, then they will be less confuse and can explore more fields of study. They can better understand their area of interest if they know atleast some basics of all the fileds to decide which one fancy themthe most. However, I do not believe that nation has to rigit their curriculum for all the students.
I am taking my example here to explain my point. When I was in school, due to restrictions of board of education in my state, I had followed a rigid curriculum. All my fellow students in my city especially following the same subjects. The curriculum that time did not include computer studies. I was very curious in that field. But, due to curriculum restrictions, I could not follow it. Since, there was great syllabus to cover, I did not follow computer studies beyond my formal studies. When I went to college, I got the option to explore computer science and programming, I grabbed the opportunity. I gradually develop an absolute interest in the field and ended up completing my undergraduate studies in Engineering of Computer Science. During my time in college, I often felt that had I given the option to choose Computer science in school, I would have been better than what I am now. I still feel that. I lack that head start that could have been tremendously helpful for me in my college.
Secondly, there were some subjects that never interest me but due to compulsion of curriculum I had to follow their advance level courses as well. That not only consume my time but also played a huge role in losing some of my concentration from studies. During the class, more times than not we lost the flow of the lecture and later had to work double to follow up on the syllabus. I found it unneccessary. I could have chosen any subject of my choice and put the same efforts their. This story was not onlu mine. Most of the students, if not all were following a stubject that they were not interested in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of it s students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- It is better to have a mentor to advise you in your career than to rely entirely on yourself 70
- Internet is good or bad 73
- It is better to have a mentor to advise you in your career than to rely entirely on yourself 70
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 33.0505617978 221% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62588235294 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5829207469 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 6.24550561798 368% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4211140722 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.2142857143 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.1785714286 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153623357563 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412371759767 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050504260781 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103491559977 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580833363541 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 14.1392134831 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.98 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.