The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the current layout of a public park compared to its initial design in 1920.
Overall, a comparison between the two given maps reveals a shift of Grange Park from a simple area into a densely organized landscape with numerous modern facilities.
Looking into the maps, it can be seen that there have been significant changes within Grange Park, making it more attractive. Firstly, one of the two semi-circled rose gardens adjacent to the north entrance was removed to form a bigger one in the middle of the park, occupying the former fountain. Moreover, the stage for musicians was upgraded into the amphitheater which takes up a larger area on the west flank of the park. The glasshouse was also demolished to make way for a new water feature, together with the appearance of a new entrance to the underground parking area underneath. In addition, the children’s playground was erected in the northeast corner, overtaking the previous pond for water plants. Lastly, all the seats were relocated to surround the new square rose garden, offering spaces for the construction of a new café next to the children’s play area.
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some People claims that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement 89
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 73
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should sp 61
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03141361257 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80514941561 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628272251309 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7848671705 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12935510546 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594009208212 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436703379022 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100474114676 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305349870398 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.