Given is the table depicting the bias of distinct age brackets on separate TV programmes in a European nation in 2012.
Perceptibly, the age group of 11-15 watching cartoons constituted the highest proportion, while the converse was true for the 21-25 age range. In addition, TV dramas were not attractive to people with the lowest figure in total at this time.
In terms of cartoons, evidently, most of the kids were interested in them so that cartoons reported 29% of people falling into the 11-15 age group watched them. In contrast, the older people are, the less they relish animations, so only 4% of people in the 21-25 age range watched them. When it comes to the feature films and sports, it is easily identified that they were two quite prevalent programmes in this period when all of the figures of these programmes achieved more than 15% for each age bracket.
It is clear that kids did not indulge themselves in watching news, so there was just 6% of people in the 11-15 compared to 23% in the 21-25 age group. Besides, soap opera distributed the viewers for the 11-15 and 21-25 age bracket with 17% and 19% respectively, 12% for the middle age group. Unfortunately, TV did not catch too many audiences with 8% of 11-15 to 13% of 21-25 age range.
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 56
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte 89
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts show the info about the use of the Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... into the 11-15 age group watched them. In contrast, the older people are, the les...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...revalent programmes in this period when all of the figures of these programmes achieved mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65919282511 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54277093096 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556053811659 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7059320036 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137440380125 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699670842344 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489755032126 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109281733882 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525177971707 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.