You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh

Essay topics:

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

The chart depicts data on how much money the families spent in two years: 1968 and 2018.
Overall, There saw an upward trend in housing, transport and leisure while the rest had a downward trend, except household goods. In general, food had the highest consumption trend in two years.
Looking at the chart, we can see that in 1968, 10% of families spent their income for housing. At the same time, they spent 8% on leisure. However, the proportion of income for leisure grew considerably to 23% while that of housing rose dramatically to 18%. Transport stood at only 6% but reached to 14% in 2018.
However, the trends in spending on food, fuel and power and personal goods were noticeably different from those. The figure for food was highest in 1968 at 35% but dramatically dropped to 16% in 2018. There was significant decrease in the number of personal goods from 1968 and 2018, falling from 8% to 4%. Fuel and power had 7% of salary and in 2018 can only spend 4% of income. The number of families spending on household goods maintainded the same level at 7%.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-25 andreahoangbp 60 view
2024-03-25 andreahoangbp view
2024-03-25 andreahoangbp view
2024-03-25 andreahoangbp view
Essays by user Ngoc21 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63157894737 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42788509588 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0149955027 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.3333333333 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138608820731 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561869956397 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534614393984 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950011568787 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635936336846 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63157894737 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42788509588 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0149955027 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.3333333333 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138608820731 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561869956397 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534614393984 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950011568787 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635936336846 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.