Do you agree or disagree ?
You can learn a lot about people by the clothes they wear.
In recent time, our style of dressing has so much influence on our lives, many people spend lot of money on buying clothes, accessories, bags. Everyone want to look perfect and sharp to stand out from crowd and want to be more attractive than others. people are more commonly judge by their looks or by their clothing. On the contrary, I believe that we can not judge people from their attire. I feel this way for two reasons which i will explore in the following essay.
First of all, nowadays people who can not afford expensive brand cloths they are also wear similar looking cloths but they all are copy of original branded clothes. These clothes are cheaper than the branded one. So, we can not learn about their socio-economical status by their outfits. However, many famous rich people are prefer to wear simple cloths rather than expensive designer attires though they have abundance of wealth. For example, Sudha Murthy wife of Narayan murthy founder and CEO of infosys one of the well known company in India. She always used to wear simple sari and lives simple life. On this basis of her sober dressing we can not estimate her wealth as well as her social status in community.
Moreover, many people determine person's intellectual ability, his character from their clothing, sometimes it is misleading. For instance, usually many celebrities, actors used to wear latest, attractive, very expensive clothes, it is very impactful to their followers who thought that they are very intelligent and Nobel person. In contrast, many actors and celebrities are involved in forgery cases and it also been seen that they were breaking rule, attempting serious crimes. Therefore, we can not decide someone's character from their clothing.
In conclusion, i am of the opinion that we can not pass judgement about person's moral character and their socio-economical condition by their clothing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-22 | h_p_000 | 60 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | UGS | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | udayrade1206 | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-22 | shirinn91 | 70 | view |
| 2016-03-04 | younes.tatari | 88 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...want to be more attractive than others. people are more commonly judge by their looks ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 433, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
.... I feel this way for two reasons which i will explore in the following essay. ...
^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'worn'.
Suggestion: worn
...rd expensive brand cloths they are also wear similar looking cloths but they all are...
^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
...s. However, many famous rich people are prefer to wear simple cloths rather than expen...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...well as her social status in community. Moreover, many people determine persons ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...many actors and celebrities are involved in forgery cases and it also been seen t...
^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... from their clothing. In conclusion, i am of the opinion that we can not pass ...
^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...economical condition by their clothing.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05732484076 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5922158368 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9402900795 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4117647059 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1176470588 5.45110844103 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190171386438 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596578674733 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514630209472 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106524824862 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610646215284 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.