The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 comparing to 2008.
As can be seen from the map, the medical centre experienced a dramatic transformation with the addition of an education room, a mother and child room, a pharmacy and a store room.
In 2008, there existed a small medical centre with a limited number of rooms. The main entrance leading to waiting room which remained unchanged in size and position. Likewise, the staff office, the reception and the laboratory experienced no changes over the period. The corridor was the way to three doctor’s offices located to the east of the treatment room and the staff office in the middle of the centre.
In 2010, the medical centre was expanded with the installation of an education room and a mother and child room on the left-hand corner. A new pharmacy was constructed in the southeast corner of the medical facility next to the laboratory. Doctor’s offices are downsized to make room for one more doctor’s office and a new store room was also created in the northeast corner of the centre.
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 73
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 100
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 67
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: unchanged
... leading to waiting room which remained unchanged in size and position. Likewise, the staff offic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, likewise, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93010752688 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76074614442 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521505376344 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1239881908 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116593246668 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609154031081 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693370892624 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923046236567 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629237750131 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.