The given chart and table illustrate the destination of Anthropology graduates from a university and the income figure after five years. Overall, full-time work is chosen by the majority of anthropology graduates and those working as government sector makes up the largest proportion of employment with highest income.
As it can be seen from the pie charts, after graduating from Anthropology, most people chose to work full-time, which is over half of the graduated and is ten times as much as people had part-time job and postgrad study, which makes up the least percentage of graduates. Whereas, the proportion of unemployed graduates is about 12%, which is approximately equal those of doing part-time job, about 15%.
Moreover, half of the graduates working as government sector have income of over 100,000 dollars, which is the highest income among all employments. Meanwhile, freelancer consultants and private companies are the second and the third employment with the top income, respectively with 40% and 30% of employees.
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- The pie charts below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting t 78
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 67
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...up the largest proportion of employment with highest income. As it can be seen from the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, second, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38036809816 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97444166999 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588957055215 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.215816559 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.166666667 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0285580369815 0.215688989381 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0141321598723 0.103423049105 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0143381731537 0.0843802449381 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0197729217029 0.15604864568 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147367512973 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.