In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many nations in the world are facing the problem of people suffering from health troubles because of consuming too much fast food. Governments are suggested to impose high tax on this production of food to prevent people from being unhealthy. This essay will discuss both views of the issue and reach to a solution.
On the one hand, charging higher tax on fast food could be burdensome for people such as students. Living in a fast-paced world makes them have no other alternative. Many people do not have enough time to prepare their own meals and have to rely on those fast and cheap restaurants. So if the food is charged a higher price, people still have no choice but to buy them willingly. Thus, this solution is not effective as it doesn’t make any difference. Moreover, imposing higher tax cannot change the consumers’ awareness of this kind of food. Many people are already informed about the threat to their health brought by binge eating but they still continue buying it due to the convenience and affordable price.
On the other hand, imposing higher tax on fast food chain restaurants could be a good idea as long as it goes along with reducing the tax on healthy food such as vegetables or meat, or the money should be used for the improvement of medical facilities. This will both help the residents to have a nutritious diet as well as a good care for their health. This is how governments should deal with the problem of their people’s health.
To sum up, that governments imposing high tax on certain kinds of food to prevent people eating them could be a great way if it comes with other improvements, or else it will be a burden to many people and doesn’t create a better situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the proportion of expenditure by students on average at one university in 2000 and 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans below show the layout of the ground floor of a museum in 1990 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 53
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with t 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table gives information about the number of deep mines producing coal in the UK between 1913 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavent 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'make'?
Suggestion: make
... students. Living in a fast-paced world makes them have no other alternative. Many pe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...the residents to have a nutritious diet as well as a good care for their health. This is h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, kind of, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6897689769 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56757192289 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518151815182 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3608342523 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364469329913 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134594379962 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838516109053 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23964490647 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053011452311 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.