The line graph depicts the quantity of acid rain emissions in millions of tones across four sectors in the UK from 1990 to 2007. Generally, domestic activities produced the least acid rain all through the 17 year period. Electricity, gas and water supply emitted the most from 1990, but ended up third on the scale by 2007, while other industries ended the period with the most activity that emitted acid rain. In addition, transport and communication was fairly constant but increased a little before dropping again by 2007.
In 1990, electricity, gas and water supply emitted the most acid rain at about 3.5 million tones, but steadily reduced up until 1997 when it convoluted to 2000 and regained its steady decline to finishing 2007 with a 0.5 million tones of emission. Other industries emitted a little above 2.0 million tones, remained constant up to 1993, before gradually dropping to a little below 1.5 million tones in 2001. Also, it ended the period with about 1.25 million tones; the most emission by 2007.
Transport and communication together with domestics produced roughly equal amount of acid rain in 1990; however, transport and communication increased up to 1 million tones before declining to 0.75 million tones by 2007. On the other hand, domestic continued to emit less acid rain, and by 2007, produced far less than the 0.5 million tones mark at around 0.2 million tones.
- the bar chart shows scores of 3 teams a b nd c over four different seasons summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons were relevant 90
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tones from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 73
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 67
- The topic is taken from Cambridge book of IELTS 9 writing task 1 test 3 The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feat 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es mark at around 0.2 million tones.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, third, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04721030043 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50226738712 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515021459227 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2724189171 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366794060463 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179680059076 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148442098344 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269396496426 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058774929458 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.