The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990

The line graph depicts the weekly consumption of three fast foods in the UK between 1970 to 1990. Generally, hamburger was the most consumed fast food by the end of the 20 year period. Pizza was the junk of choice in 1970, but fell out of want and by 1990, became the least fast food eaten on a 7 day basis. Fish and chips although started the period as the least consumed junk eaten, it steadily increased and became the second fast food of choice by 1990.

Beginning the period, pizza was the most consumed junk with a weekly consumption of 300, but it steadily declined until 1985 at 200 when its consumption rate increased a little; however, it finished the least consumed fast food in 1990 by a little over 200. Hamburger and fish and chips displayed similar trend on their weekly consumption rate as they steadily increased throughout the 20 year period. They collectively started the year 1970 below the 100 weekly consumption mark. Nonetheless, hamburger's weekly rate increased to 500, while fish and chips attained just below the 300 mark.

Hamburger finished the period as the most consumed readily accessible food, edging over fish and chips in 1985 when it was consumed 300 times in the week.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nonetheless, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76666666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44903146204 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0424659801 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286233269604 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155650341858 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130440833645 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198395787526 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11104486662 0.0819641961636 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.