The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table sheds lights on the ratio of Australians who came to the theater during 1996-2000 along with their average visiting time, while the line graph gives an insight into the frequency of visiting of 4 different age groups in the same period.
As can be seen from the table, notwithstanding the upward trend in the number of theater visitors, their visiting frequency exhibited a downward pattern. And there were resemblances in the tendency of visiting cinema of people from distinct age groups.
When it coms to the table’s data, 62% of Australians went to the cinema in 1996, it then rose to 72% and stabilize for the rest of the period, except for a slight drop to 70% in 1999. In contrast, time span witnessed a remarkable decrease in Australians’ average visiting times, from 10.3 in 1996 to just 8.3 in 2000.
Considering the figures of the line graph, it is noteworthy that the younger the citizens were, the more times they came to the theater, with those from 14-24 years old took the first position at around 15-23 times. Interestingly, the data for all age groups were in the similar tendency, they all went through significant fluctuation during the 4-year period, with modest rise in 1997 prior to a fall in 1998, they were then grew again and culminated with slightly higher figures compared to their starting points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-21 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 84
- The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Environmental damage is the problem of most countries What factors damage the environment and who should takes responsibility 89
- When a new town is planned it is more important to develop public parks and sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time in To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think children have the freedom to make mistakes while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84415584416 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6321058318 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6153453689 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.857142857 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190328511715 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981516070578 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629102278835 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125210563553 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499490881813 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.