The world has become a “global village”; countries are interdependent on each other. It seems that tourists are beholding approximately the same scenery everywhere, as parts of the globe lose their distinctive features. This essay will explain the causes and consequences of this trend.
Globalization, undoubtably, is the major cause of this trend. The beginning of globalization can be traced back to Columbus, standing on the Santa Maria, sighting land. Before the Columbian exchange, America had Native Americans living off the fat of the land, hunting and gathering in tribes. Europe which no longer had a great power overarching it, and had entered the Renaissance, was busy painting biblical scenes and portraits. Starting in 1492, the two worlds, which God had cast asunder were starting to unite and become alike. The establishment of a trade route merged the fauna and flora groups into one: in fact, nowadays, tomato crops which is native to America can be seen everywhere around the globe. In America, windmills and churches sporadically decorate the fields in America, just like how they stand in European fields. A city mimicking York has been established, and was name New York. There must be some similarities in those cities. In the above example, we can see the availability of transport allowed cultures and sites in the “Two World” to converge. Globalization is doing the exact same thing. People, carriers of their cultures, are now allowed to fly around the world, land and thrive in the opposite end of the globe. They carry their aesthetic preferences for buildings, which probably resemble their hometown. As those different tastes accumulate, they would start to affect the scenery.
As scenery in different parts of the world converges, traveling, especially for international tourists, can be unnecessary. Why travel tens of thousands of miles to Denmark to appreciate the buildings that are covered in vibrant colors when there is a town constructed in a similar fashion just a one-day-drive away? Diversity is lost in the process of globalization, making traveling around increasingly monotonous. Moreover, with people less willing to travel, international tourism would plummet, and countries that heavily depend on it would be forcefully hit by this trend.
In terms of advantages, tourists can now experience different parts of the world, their food, their landscape, all in places around their areas of residence. This makes it more convenient for people who want to grasp the view of the whole world.
To conclude, differences in the world are being eaten up by globalization, and this is making international tourism a lot less interesting.
- In the past people used to travel to see the differences from their home country However the sceneries in places around the world seem similar nowadays What are the causes of these similarities Do you think that the advantages of these similarities outwei 47
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer TPO41 87
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 45
- Some people think that the media should not report details of crimes to the public To what extent do you agree or disagree 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar fashion" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...colors when there is a town constructed in a similar fashion just a one-day-drive away? Diversity is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34117647059 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10649370097 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585882352941 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9807422183 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5833333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7083333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.04166666667 7.06120827912 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 3.4128256513 440% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178734202513 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450094603786 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364068753773 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10153590838 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035480073543 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.