Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking?
The number of people going for a walk daily has been diminishing steadily. Several accompanying reasons for this trend are determined and worth considering to come up with viable solutions which hinder this tendency and to stimulate more and more people to walk.
People might feel demotivated to walk stemming from two prominent reasons. Firstly, it is argued that people have plenty of work to do at the workplace which prevents them from having some spare moments. The only free-from-work period of time they have is at night which is packed with dozens of personal routines so it is hardly surprising that walking is not their best choice. Secondly, many people consider walking as a tedious leisure activity. Other forms of recreation that are justified in taking up such as gym, cooking and so forth due to its immediate results and benefits.
Having seen such reasons, individuals and the government should try to promote walking by adopting some feasible approaches. Raising awareness of walking is one of the best options. For example, the authorities could conduct a workshop indicating some concerning health issues leading from a sedentary lifestyle and how they could be addressed by walking. Besides, some forms of incentive is a good idea to encourage walking. To get the attention of people to walking, several sorts of marathon contest should be carried out, appealing to people by some prizes.
To sum up, while the reasons for walking issues are clearly seen, a promotion of walking should be made by some kinds of competition coupled with a deep understanding of the benefits that walking could bring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | ililmaidatuz | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ililmaidatuz | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-02 | maiduc | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | queanh | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | queanh | 78 | view |
- the bar chart below shows the number of research students studying a different subject in 2005
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different finds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005 2006 2007 and 2008 78
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considering coming'.
Suggestion: considering coming
...for this trend are determined and worth considering to come up with viable solutions which hinder t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... spare moments. The only free-from-work period of time they have is at night which is packed w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0936329588 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71348249988 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5636581884 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.615384615 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248289611285 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910631356355 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534221396268 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152264095917 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250285486789 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.