Frequency of Eating at Fast Food Restaurants in the USA. The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013
The bar graph illustrates the proportion of people eating at fast food restaurants in the USA in 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, the majority of people used to eat at a fast food restaurant once a week or once or twice a month over the period given.
In 2003, 31% of people are eating at a fast food restaurant once a week which increased to 33% in 2006 before declining to 28% by 2013. However, the ratio of people who are eating once or twice a month at these restaurants is 30% in 2003 and 25% in 2006 which climbed to 33% by the end of the given period.
Those who are eating fast food several times a week was approximately 17% in 2003 and after three years the frequency climbed to 20% however which decreased to 16% by 2013. Likewise, among American citizens, 5% of people never tried to eat at fast food restaurants in 2003, and later the frequency decreased to 3% in the next given years. Meanwhile, below 5% of people are eating in fast food restaurants every day in the whole given period. Moreover, the percentage of people eating at fast food restaurants a few times a year was 13% in 2003 which remained the same as 20% in 2006 and 2013.
- The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998 2000 2002 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Some cities have vehicle free days when private cars trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses taxis and metro on vehicle free days Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Advertisements on toys and fast foods lure children most Do you think it has negative effect on children as well as family 64
- Some people argue that arts such as music and paintings are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecreased to 16% by 2013. Likewise, among American citizens, 5% of people never tr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37037037037 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45759649277 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425925925926 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.4025485349 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441085233126 0.215688989381 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.259618911986 0.103423049105 251% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10313817673 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328822143708 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112960846367 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.