Q 17 More and more people are using computers and electric devices to access information therefore there is no need to print books, magazines and newspapers on paper. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the need for printed books has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that people do not need to keep a record of information on paper, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from the development of electronic books and magazines. Perhaps the principal benefit is that the introduction of electronic documents has revolutionised the way people have access to a huge amount of information on electronic devices, such as smartphones and tablets regardless of time and place considering that having access to the Internet is the sole requirement. Thus, not only can users of electronic gadgets be free from bringing heavy hard copies, but they are also able to find the meaning of unknown words thanks to the search function in devices. In addition, from the publishing companies' point of view, they are instantly capable of correcting their mistakes, including typing errors, on the Internet instead of releasing new editions on paper, which costs a fortune.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that the advancement of electronic documents merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that electronic materials can be hacked, exerting a detrimental influence on both individuals and society. To be more specific, criminals can access personal information as well as countries' official documents. To provide a hypothetical example, if confidential information were revealed to offenders, this would pose a threat to national security. Furthermore, the availability of electronic books has a negative effect on pupils. If students are only allowed to use electronic textbooks, they would have difficulty concentrating on their classes given that they could play online games or keep in touch with their peers on electronic devices through social media. This can even do harm to their academic performance. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | hellielts | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | hellielts | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
- X 84
- Q 20 In modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food or use animal products for instance clothing and medicines To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- X 89
- Q15 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Q16 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2084.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31632653061 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98646816267 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573979591837 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3688025391 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122441341734 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377628701967 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514233887391 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711629731027 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521682974467 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.