After the First Industrial Revolution, society developed rapidly. Not only does the economy become prosperous, but people’s spiritual quality also increases significantly. People begin to think more about social obligations and action rules, which people need to follow. However, different people have own different opinions about these social demands. Now, there is a controversy. Some believe that the more affluent people are, the more they need to donate, while others disagree with this opinion. I advocate that the more money a person has, the more they should contribute.
First of all, doing charity has advantages for rich people themselves. Raising money for charity can improve rich people’s social influence. Donating money is a kind of charitable deed which has a significant impact. Many media will report this activity, so more people may pay attention to this generous rich person. Under this situation, not only will the charitable people be known as kind-hearted, but the company in which they behave will also be reported as compassionate. Positive propaganda of the company will let people believe this company’s credit and the product’s quality. For this reason, more customers will be willing to buy something from this company with a charitable leader. As a result, the company will make more profits, and the rich people will also gain in this process.
Second, giving away more to charity will also be good for society. It is helpful to sustain social stability. Nowadays, some poor people feel unsatisfied with their living conditions and even do something illegal, such as robbery, to make money. This kind of action will disturb the stability of society, and people may feel worried about their safety. If rich people can donate money to help poor people change their living quality, the poor will have enough money to invest in small businesses and sustain their families. Under stable living conditions, some poor people will not disturb social stability.
Moreover, more donations from wealthy people will allow the government to develop other aspects. The government uses considerable outlay to help many poor people every year. Because of this situation, the government cannot emphasize different elements. By contrast, if the rich people can donate more money, the government may use the revenue to develop other aspects, such as medical well-being and public transportation.
Admittedly, some oppositions about this opinion are reasonable in some cases. Donation is a kind of voluntary action, and rich people have the right to decide how to use their personal property. Thus, they are not obligated to give money to charity. Furthermore, rich people can use their money to do other more meaningful things. They can provide houses at a low price for the poor. They can explore new energy that makes profits and is critical for sustainable development.
Although some reasons support the opposition, it is still more reasonable for rich people to donate more to charity. After all, donating has advantages for rich people themselves and society.
- For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The more money a person has the more he or she should give away to the charities 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The more money a person has the more he or she should give away to the charities 73
- A university should focus more on its facilities such as libraries computers or laboratory rather than on hiring famous teachers 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, thus, well, while, after all, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2617.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34081632653 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67080487255 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477551020408 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7331083462 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.303030303 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8484848485 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0303030303 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184532351566 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603561633821 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758568772269 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112541092737 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045292038594 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.