Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
The more money a person has, the more he or she should give away to the charities
Bill Gates donates billions every year. While people admire his generosity, some of them tend to normalize this behaviour. It seems logical to give away more money if one has more money. However, in my opinion, there are more things rich people can invest in order to feedback the society.
First of all, with a huge amount of money, billionaires can build new companies that will create new jobs and boost the national economy to reward society. Elon Musk spent every penny of his money to launch SpaceX and Tesla in 2012 which, cannot be denied that, benefit human beings as much as the Bill Gate's charity does. The productions include green vehicles which facilitate the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and more information about Mars which will be useful to the future generations. Besides, these two companies have more than 50,000 workers, reducing unemployment greatly.
Also, setting up a scholarship fund would be a great choice instead of simply sending money away. Expensive tuition is the main barrier holding back the talented students who have the potential to become scientists, artists, doctors and even entrepreneurs. With more scholarship fundings, a country can have more talents to construct the future world. An illustrating example is my experience with Imperial College London which's tuition is more than 30,000 pounds a year. Without the scholarship, I might just give up graduate study and become an assembly line worker in the industry. But now, I am glad that I continue my cancer research that can help more patients to relieve their pains.
For normal people like us, doing charity is encouraged but not obligatory. Compare with billionaires or millionaires, the differences between the amount of money we have are negligible. Regardless of a little bit more or less money, we should spend it on our own first. Because there is an old saying that "charity begins at home". It is helping others by live well yourself.
In conclusion, people have more money do not necessary to donate more. Billionaires and millionaires can establish new companies or new fundings to illustrate their kindness while ordinary people should take care of themselves first, though charity is a good way to fight poverty and help disables.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | abusrddddd | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | abusrddddd | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-04 | AliKopol | 82 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Reading fiction (such as novels and short stories) is more enjoyable than watching movies. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The more money a person has the more he or she should give away to the charities 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 171, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ces between the amount of money we have are negligible. Regardless of a little bit ...
^^^
Line 13, column 203, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...we have are negligible. Regardless of a little bit more or less money, we should spend it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73520457128 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637837837838 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8035339119 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.619047619 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263175188853 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798174003101 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871704032999 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152807588704 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299344696072 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.