Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
This question represents the arbitrary choice regarding the way of communicate. Some prefer people elaborate their ideas physically while some incline to express them digitally. As far as I am concerned, my own preference and experience have led me to conclude that people will work better for the project if we communicate about it in person.
To begin with, personally, I think I will do a better work if I communicate about a project in person, for it will be more easily to observe others. When we discuss face to face, I can read my team member’s reaction and emotion, which means I can notice instantly if there are something controversial or inappropriate. For example, once I discussed my proposal with professor by email, I misunderstood the meaning that contained in the words which the professor typed, so I got a very low grade on that homework.
In addition, I consider that communicating face to face is more efficient than sending email. This may sound absurd because sending email spends less time. However, just because sending email spend less time, so people usually will not reply it efficiently. Take one of my friends, Jeff, for example, he always forget to reply the email that send to him, since he thinks he can do it later after he received it.
Finally, communicating about project physically can encourage people to make more effort on it. Imagining two circumstances, one is you discuss with your classmates and colleagues in person, and everyone express their thoughts about the project sincerely, hoping all of you can make all-out effort on the project so you can accomplish the project perfectly together. The other situation is just cold and indifferent alphabets on email that exchange some information for the project. Apparently, at least for myself, the former one make me want to work harder on the project.
Given the reasons above, I firmly believe that communicate with others in person can make a better result. This is not to say that the opposite opinion is totally unreasonable. Nevertheless, I believe I have substantiated reasons to support my point of view.
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- tpo 65 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 76
- TPO 64 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'forgets'.
Suggestion: forgets
...y friends, Jeff, for example, he always forget to reply the email that send to him, si...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, at least, for example, i think, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01416430595 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91062391531 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549575070822 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4586507127 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.117647059 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27794536498 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083743009111 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920199490606 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147579992295 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743520955286 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.