Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people argue that it is more joyful for working three days continuously and having a rest for remaining four days a week. They cite that usually working for three days with tight schedule let four days more relaxing and have much time to hang out with friends and can have long-drive with beloved one. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that working for five days for shorter hours is far more pleasant for following two reasons.
To commence, working for shorter for just five days loose the schedule and could help to balance personal pace. In other words individual can have enough time to spend with families on daily basis and less exhausted as comparison to long hectic work. For instance, Nursing have so hectic and tight schedule, since they have to do night to day shift continuously for five days in hospital, but have two-four off days. As a result of night shift they are too flagged that they might not stabilized their personal life and might become victims of anxiety and depression in their life. If they would have five-days workday, probably they would devote towards their family as well as show affection towards patient at the same time. Unfortunately, it could not do so. It is important to devotion the enough time to family and coordinate the personal life because it is main gate way to be jubilant and elated in life. Thus, the short workday maintain the balance in person life and way to become more dilighted.
Furthermore, working only few days with shorter period is more euphoric as it helps to proliferate the personal ability of the person and it becomes productivity. To illustrate the example of my own experience, five years ago I worked in the companies where there was only shorter days workday with longer hours. Despite the huge off days, I would not invest myself to upgrade my personal growth. I become victims of anxiety and depression due lack of sleep. Ultimately, I left that job which affects me totally. Later on, I joint the companies with 5 workdays with shorter hours. Fortunately, it helps to accelerate my efficiency of job and within 4 months I got promotion with copious amount of salary. Moreover, I become more confident and it get away all my anxiety. It is crucial to mounting the personal capability because it helps bourgeoning the confidence and efficiency of individual. Therefore, for graceful and enthusiastic life working days should be 5 days per week with sparse hours.
To sum up, whether working only three days for prolong hours is more blissful than working five days with tiny hours is complex. Some suggested that engaging in job for only 2-3 days per week with longer time is enjoyable as we can hang-out with friends and can traveler with them for more days. Nevertheless, I still contend that working only 5 days with 5 hour per week is more euphoric because it helps to balance personal life and more productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are co 93
- The United Kingdom sometimes referred to as Britain has a long and rich history of human settlement Traces of buildings tools and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years from the Stone Age through the Bronze Age the Iron Age the t 3
- A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx preserved in volcanic ash was discovered in Liaoning China in 1996 Interestingly the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones Some paleontologists interpret the lines as 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... long hectic work. For instance, Nursing have so hectic and tight schedule, since...
^^
Line 5, column 747, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gets'?
Suggestion: gets
...oreover, I become more confident and it get away all my anxiety. It is crucial to m...
^^^
Line 5, column 789, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mount'?
Suggestion: mount
...t away all my anxiety. It is crucial to mounting the personal capability because it help...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 839, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to bourgeon' or 'bourgeon'.
Suggestion: to bourgeon; bourgeon
...he personal capability because it helps bourgeoning the confidence and efficiency of indivi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...contend that working only 5 days with 5 hour per week is more euphoric because it he...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82703777336 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54639452376 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471172962227 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9009644005 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.166666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9583333333 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420700078823 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126095246317 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111777591287 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296632429403 0.150856017488 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099212367121 0.0645574589148 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.