Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading passage.
In the reading material, the author cites three reasons to support the viewpoint that bees don’t exist on Earth as early as 20 million years ago. Nevertheless, the lecturer in the listening material argues that bees can possible exist 20 million years ago on Earth and she thinks the reasons from the skeptics are not convincing.
First and foremost, the author argues that there is no fossils of actual bees 20 million years ago and the earliest preserved body of bees is 100 million years ago. However the speaker argues that although it’s true that there is no fossil, it is probably because the body of bees can’t be preserved. The body of insects can be preserved in the special liquid produced by trees and it is very rare. The lack of quantity doesn’t mean that bees don’t exist.
In addition, the article mentions that bees have close association with the flowering plants but that kind of plants don’t exist until 125 million years ago so the bees may not exist. The speaker cast doubts on this kind of certain conclusion that bees may have the mutual relationship with non-flowering plants like pine-tree before flowering plants exist. After a period of time when flowering plants exist, the bees start to build connection with them.
Finally, the third reason from the article argues that the structures that resemble bees’ nest lack the detail of caps which is common in the modern bees. The speaker counteracted that the chemical from the water-proof material used by both modern bees and the fossil is the same which can be an evidence that bees exist.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Alana Gerber | 90 | view |
| 2022-08-26 | waliwaliwa | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-11 | Louissun | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Louissun | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Louissun | 3 | view |
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 85
- People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 88
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their study of field is 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 44, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no fossils'?
Suggestion: there are no fossils
...st and foremost, the author argues that there is no fossils of actual bees 20 million years ago and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... body of bees is 100 million years ago. However the speaker argues that although it’s t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... before flowering plants exist. After a period of time when flowering plants exist, the bees s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, nevertheless, so, third, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87407407407 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38627764262 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7916664817 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.636363636 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0249487742906 0.272083759551 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0135738717004 0.0996497079465 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0151043794146 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.018837795457 0.162205337803 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122900356568 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.