The given graph provides information about how many people visited a particular Caribbean island and the accommodations they chose in millions from 2010 to 2017.
In general, the total number of tourists visiting the Caribbean island showed a considerable upward trend throughout the period. In addition, in the beginning of the period, there were more tourists staying on the island than on cruise ships, but in the end of the period the condition was on the other way around.
It can be clearly seen from the graph that there was a significant increase of the number of people visiting the island staying on cruise ships, starting at 250 thousands in 2010. Having fluctuated for the next three years, the figure then rose dramatically, finishing at two million visitors by the end of 2017, making it the most preferred place to stay.
On the other hand, although it remained the same in the first one year, standing at roughly 750 thousands, the number of tourists staying on the island had doubled by 2013, followed by a constant trend in the two following years. The figure declined by approximately one-fourth millions before it went up to 1.5 millions in 2017.
- City transport mode shares in Asia in 2012 45
- City transport mode shares in Asia in 2012 67
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- City transport mode shares in Asia in 2012 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94949494949 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68656487992 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.8282455573 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238701134981 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113331580752 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815346427313 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149452147482 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635274103025 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.