QUEEN MARY HOSPITAL ELUCIDATED BY THE GIVEN DIAGRAM BELOW SINCE ITS CONSTRUCTION IN 1960.
The diagram illustrates the improvement made in Queen Mary Hospital by three stages in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Overall, the shopping centre and farmland have demolished whereas the hospital and the car park remained the same. There were decreased in the size of the car park by half while cancer centre, pharmacy and nursing school have introduced.
In 1960, at the first stage of its development, the hospital was built next to the main road and close to the shopping centre. The area right behind of the hospital has turned into a car park while the area behind the shopping centre was farmland.
In the second phrase of improvement, there was an introduction of a pharmacy and a cancer building. While the shopping centre and the farmland were demolished the hospital and the carpark were remained unchanged. The shopping centre changed into pharmacy and a cancer building whereas the farmland has replaced by the nursing school.
In the last phrase of improvement on Queen Mary Hospital, all the buildings have remained same but the size has modified. Even though, the hospital and pharmacy had unchanged in size, car park and nursing school have showed a reduction in size. In comparison, the cancer centre showed the dramatic expansions as it tripled in size.
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U S from 1960 to 2011 75
- The bar chart shows shares of expenditures food transportation housing health care and clothing in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in 2009 80
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 70
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 50
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 212 200
No. of Characters: 1027 1000
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.816 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.844 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.489 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 78 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 54 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.273 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 2.7 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.447 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.724 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.104 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4