Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions.
Due to the development of urban areas, the way of living has changed drastically. A major deviation has been seen in people's lifestyle during the past few decades. The essay will scrutinize colossal reasons behind it, followed by some remedies before venturing to a logical conclusion.
One of the major causes for this change is that cities are overcrowded as these are the hubs for various industries. Persons from the rural areas come here for different job opportunities because of scarcity of employment in their locality. Another reason behind this problem is damage to the environment through air, water, and noise pollution. Pollution is not only caused by industrial waste but also by excess uses of private vehicles. For example, Delhi has the most polluted air in all of India due to the pollution released from factories and private vehicles. Eventually, it creates a harmful environment for the citizens which affects their life expectancy. Despite numerous efforts of the government, this situation cannot be controlled.
However, quality of life can be improved if the public and authorities come together to fight against these issues. Promoting public transport in cities may inculcate the habit of using buses and local trains rather than using private wheels. Though this benchmark cannot be achieved by just circulating government orders, awareness among the public is also required. Adding to this, the option of work from home should also be provided to employees wherever possible, in order to control the population of such cities. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, most of the corporate offices were shut down but their employees worked remotely from their hometowns which improved the air composition of metropolitan cities, along with no loss to the company.
To encapsulate, better life expectancy is in the hands of human beings. If they do not take preventive measures at this time, it would be harmful for them in the future stages. Government should also take steps to improve the lifestyle in cities by allowing only nature friendly businesses plans, so that life could be better in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-05 | maanpandya | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | heyimmehak@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | aman kola | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-15 | DoDt | 90 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | thaskeen123 | 78 | view |
- It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries Do you think it is positive or a negative development Give your opinion and relevant example from your experience 84
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that the products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Globalization has brought about more positive economic impacts than negative ones To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries Do you think it is positive or a negative development Give your opinion and relevant example from your experience 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., along with no loss to the company. To encapsulate, better life expectancy i...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 327, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ses plans, so that life could be better in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28279883382 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72311322695 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615160349854 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5945310575 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0874365468386 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275626237157 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368227184126 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483330360007 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295638202997 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.