The given table compares the proportion of the use of transportation modes in three different cities, Beijing, Delhi, and Seoul, in 2012. Overall, the most popular mode of transportation in Beijing was private transport, while that of Delhi and Seoul were walking and rail, respectively.
Looking into details, almost one-third of people in Beijing preferred to travel by private vehicles, making them the most popular transportation mode, followed by bus at just about one-fourth as the second place. The next lists were train and cycle, contributing around 15% to the total. Reaching no more than 6%, taxi, walking, and other modes of transportation become the least preferable to be chosen in this city.
In addition, although walking was the most popular in Delhi, accounting for 35%, it was the least popular in the other two cities, only reaching no more than 3%. Chosen by approximately a quarter of the population, walking and private transport came as the second and third rank, respectively, followed by the other modes at less than 6% for each.
Furthermore, in Seoul, train came in first place of the popularity, which was chosen by almost 4 out of 10, followed by bus and private transport at 27% and 23%, respectively. Moreover, the rest of transportation modes were least chosen, only used by less than 5% in this city.
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- City transport mode shares in Asia in 2012 61
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- City transport mode shares in Asia in 2012 67
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'trained'.
Suggestion: trained
...s the second place. The next lists were train and cycle, contributing around 15% to t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06306306306 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9116108046 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.169087064 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.888888889 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190096943036 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953394847663 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663086262299 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13463658245 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654998160208 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.