The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line graph compares how much refuse was produced by companies A, B, and C from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, there was a decrease in the amount of waste released by companies A and B, while the figure for company C saw a gradual increase. In addition, company B generally had the highest amount of sewage until being surpassed by company C in the 2010s.
About 12 tonnes of waste was produced by company A in 2000, with a subsequent decrease to roughly 11 tonnes of waste in 2007. Conversely, the amount of waste produced by company B started at the south of 9 tonnes, after which it experienced a rise to around 10 tonnes of waste in 2005, before declining to precisely 9 tonnes of waste in 2007. The figure for company C saw some similarities compared to company B, doubling from the north of 3 tonnes to approximately 6 tonnes of waste in 2007.
The amount of dust discharged by company C surpassed the figures of companies A and B in 2010 and 2015 to become the company having the highest amount of waste, followed by a constant increase to its peak (around 10 tonnes of waste) at the end of the period examined. Opposite changes can be seen in the figures for companies A and B, which experienced an annual decline to theirs low (8 and 3 tonnes of waste respectively).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
- some people say that advertising is extremely successfully at persuading us to buy things Other people think that adversingingis so common hat e no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opininon 61
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proximately 6 tonnes of waste in 2007. The amount of dust discharged by company...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44017094017 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69728545397 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457264957265 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6460765395 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280607629578 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147973611459 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405360555588 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185425273879 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237521056905 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.