Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
The most important reason why a leader is appointed is to take morally sound decisions for himself as well as for the others. Therefore, sound moral judgment is more important characteristic of an effective leader than to maintain respect of his or her peers.
It is very well known that you cannot make everyone in this world happy. When you work in a team, there will be conflicts. But the duty of the leader is to have a sharp, long and clear vision of the end goal. This point can be proven by taking the example of Microsoft in early 2010s. Bill Gates' vision to set leading standards in software industry was abrupted by the employees when they wanted to enter and compete into the Smartphone market. Not only the smartphones with Windows operating system were a complete flop, Microsoft lost huge amount of money, resources, time and efforts thus proving the point stated above.
Although having the respect of your peers is an important aspect in how smoothly the team moves forward, sometimes the leader gets too pressed and sacrifices his/her thoughts and visions in fear of conflicts or backlash from society. If we observe in our everyday lives, how often do we find that prime minister/president has come up with the idea of his/her own ? Oftentimes, the idea is introduced by a peer who is confident in his thoughts, and the leader just takes the decision because he/she holds his/her ideas back in fear of backlash in case situation turns out bad.
Although sound moral judgment is the utmost quality of a leader, there is some truth in the counter-arguments as well. If a team does not functions as a whole, it often becomes weak and the chance of fallout increase drastically. If we take a look at how Britishers were able to take control over India, Mughals were at the peak of their power. Yet the backlash from different religions as well as conspiracies by inner people weakened the country, and thus Britishers were able to defeat Mughals and hence Colonial Rule began. However, this is a rare case scenario and can be considered as an exception to the fact that the leader should take right judgement.
Although the success of the team is responsibility of each and every member who is a part of it, the role of the leader is crucial. The leader should be logical, sharp and focused to the end goal and taking sound moral judgment should be his/her utmost priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'function'
Suggestion: function
...r-arguments as well. If a team does not functions as a whole, it often becomes weak and t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73923444976 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64153796921 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555023923445 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3288034023 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.055555556 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378151287977 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10984144038 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157408346861 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226786874114 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17214974871 0.0667264976115 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'function'
Suggestion: function
...r-arguments as well. If a team does not functions as a whole, it often becomes weak and t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73923444976 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64153796921 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555023923445 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3288034023 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.055555556 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378151287977 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10984144038 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157408346861 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226786874114 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17214974871 0.0667264976115 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.