The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after development next year.
The diagrams illustrate the layout of an airport as it is in the present and how the same area will look in the future after having been developed.
In general, the area is expected to experience drastic changes in facilities and transports system. The most significant differences could be seen in the construction of a sky strain and more facilities.
In terms of transformation in facilities, a check-in counter in the northwest is removed to construct a Bag drop while a coffee shop is erected opposite the bag drop located in the southwest corner, Shops are built on the second floor of the security passport control. Moreover, the coffee shop is eliminated to pave the way for the check-in counter for more customers. Plenty of facilities are built in the passport control customs which is a coffee shop, ATM, and car hire is extended.
As far as developments in transport systems are concerned, departures and arrivals in the security passport control are now will be expanded with two entrances for check-in, and two arrivals for check-out. Another transformation is that Gates are eliminated to pave the way for more gates which are 1 to 18 gates on the top of the roof, and two ways are erected in the northeast and northwest. The transformation of a walkaway is converted into a sky train, making it increase in size.
- The graph below shows the average house prices in 3 countries between the years 1997 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Traffic congestion has become one of the major issues in cities What are the problems people face due to traffic Discuss the possible solutions of overcoming it 89
- Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- The diagrams below show how oil is expected in the use of production of perfume 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, second, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85087719298 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95304121998 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8177212357 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0878623354822 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366295923392 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801977671788 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754905078008 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104518625701 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, second, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85087719298 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95304121998 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8177212357 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0878623354822 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366295923392 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801977671788 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754905078008 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104518625701 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.