Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education, one of the most important tasks for teachers and parents, triggers heated discussions over whether it is more difficult to educate children than before. Educating kids, in some people's view, is harder nowadays because children spend a plethora of time on cell phones and other entertainment. On the contrary, my perspective is that teaching kid is easier than decades ago because of the following reasons.
First, never should we ignore that, with the development of technology, it is uncomplicated for children to acquire expertise compared with in the past, reducing the workload of parents and teachers. To begin with, by using the search engine, children are capable of obtaining useful knowledge or finding answers independently. After typing in the queries into the search engine, they will be presented with assorted information related to their question and diverse angles toward a problem. As a result, it is not necessary for them to refer to their parents or teachers. Besides, students are able to have access to unlimited resources from social networking websites. For instance, on Twitter or forums, students are able to meet with established professors or experts who are laborious to be accessed previously. Social media provide platforms for teenagers to exchange ideas with these people and get instructions when confronting difficulties. However, in the past, what kids can do exclusively in such situations is to consult teachers, which will make them feel exhausted.
In addition, what should be highlighted is that digital equipment, such as cell phones or computers, can serve as teaching tools in the classroom, making it less arduous to convey knowledge. To be more specific, teachers can adopt some pedagogical approaches regarding these electronic devices. For example, during the class, the teacher can direct students to visit some websites, search some useful facts or background information, or view some related illustrations as well as videos. As a result, students will gain a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of what the teacher is talking about, which is definitely more effective than the old teaching method.
Admittedly, in contemporary times, some teenagers are indulged in games, due to the lack of supervision from parents. But even without cell phones or computers, teenagers are also likely to be addicted to other entertainment, such as playing cards or toys. Parents should always attach more significance to encouraging students to enjoy learning and restrict the time they spend on entertainment disregarding the type of it, no matter in the past or present.
In conclusion, educating children is not onerous as it was in the past because nowadays children can get access to information effortlessly and advanced technology improves teaching efficiency.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the past are more interested in improving their neighbourhood the area where they live than now 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 83
- Your friend is going to reduce the living expenses Which of the following way would you recommend to your friend and why 1 Find a roommate that can share the living expenses 2 Buy the new technology products less frequently 3 Shop for less expensive food 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the past are more interested in improving their neighbourhood the area where they live than now 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, talking about, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2396.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44545454545 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03103778971 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4681776051 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.105263158 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2631578947 5.45110844103 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222700057803 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635584169812 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475442189293 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127285371595 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580967325249 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.