“Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.”
Now-a-days, Men and Women are equally performing in many jobs. But still there are several tasks where we can clearly see a difference in the work done by each gender. These gaps in work quality are mainly due to the inherent physical differences in the men and women. I agree with the claim that, men and women are not equally suited for the tasks due to their physical differences, for two reasons.
Firstly, The hormones that control the men and women qualities are completely different. Testosterone levels in Men's body helps men to have more physical strength than the women. The women's hormone estrogen develops other physical features like long hair growth. These physical difference due to harmones differentiate men and women in tasks they perform. For example, Sports like basket ball is mostly suitable for men. This sport requires tall height and muscular body with quick reflexes. These are the qualities that testosterone hormone mostly supports. So obviously, men has an added advantage to play these king of sports when compared to the women. This is also the reason why most of sports has men domination. This example clearly illustrates how the hormones differentiate the men from women in the sports sector.
Second, The physical strutural difference in men and women are clearly visible. Men generally have high concentration arm muscle, but the women body is bit different. Few of the tasks require strength in the limbs. For instance, a labor work like lifting weights or driving large vehicles for long distances. In general men are more favoured for these kind of works as they can do these tedious tasks. Women are favoured in craetive and mental tasks. This example clearly shows that physical structure clearly plays a cruical
On the contrary, people may argue that men and women are performin equally in the tasks where mental strength plays a role. Eventhough this is correct we can still see several sectors where we can see the difference. Either its is due to support from internal hormones or variation in the physical structure, both men and women are not equally suited for the all the tasks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Pranav Lohote | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | motherastronaut12 | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the sports') or simply say ''most sports''.
Suggestion: most of the sports; most sports
... the women. This is also the reason why most of sports has men domination. This example clearl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...differentiate the men from women in the sports sector. Second, The physical strut...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 347, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...s. In general men are more favoured for these kind of works as they can do these tedious t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ysical structure clearly plays a cruical On the contrary, people may argue that m...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, still, for example, for instance, in general, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02247191011 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54163040498 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2661659998 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.7391304348 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4782608696 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246752422191 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084701041968 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694342219163 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179160960748 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716009882298 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.