Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
In ancient times, women were restricted to household works and were not allowed to have a say in their own life. But, with the modernization of the world, many women started taking up jobs and going against the age old patriachy that stopped them from progressing. I mostly disagree that men and women because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. I disagree for the follwoing few reasons stated below.
Men and women physical abilities and not equal and this plays and important factor in the field of military. In many countries, women officers and soldiers are not allowed for combat roles. The main reason cited for this step is that, if a female soldier is being captured by the enemy forces she can be subjected to sexual torture. Countries including USA, Russia, India and many more even though have opened combat opportunities in the airforce, certain combat roles for women in the army are still being considered and yet to be implemented.
However, in the past century women were not considered for a leadership role in the field of politics. There were hardly any female heads of the state. But, gradually many women have fought their way up to the apex and have been elected as the President or Prime Minister of their state. Examples like Angela Merkel, Indira Gandhi, Sheikh Hasina and many more contested elections against their male counterparts, won and have successfully led their countries to great achievements.
The trend has seen a rather unusual increase in the number of female politicians in the world in the past decade and it would not be presumptous to say that women are working on par with their male politicians and leading from the front.
Moreover, in the field of Space Exploration it was considered that women could not withstand the gravitational force exerted on the human body along with not able to withstand the mental pressure and were restrained from going in to space exploration missions. But, female astronauts like Kalpana Chawla, Sunita Williams and many more displayed the women strength and their integrity is not any less than their male counterparts and that gender should not be a deciding factor for the mission. They have manifested that with knowledge and training it is possible to achieve any goal regardless the gender, and thus paved the way for many more women to join their ranks.
Some professions in which physical abilities are a deciding factor may yet not be ready for women. But after analyzing and weighing the pros and cons today's women are certainly paving their way for more tasks that were considered as a male oriented. But, it would not be long before make barriers and broken and women stand equally with men and do the jobs together.
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider ways in which the statement might or mig 16
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider ways in which the statement might or mig 16
- Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The result is an increase in assaults property damage and disruptions of 70
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 83
- Unexamined Conservatism is far more dangerous than reckless change 58
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92291220557 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54941938075 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503211991435 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2509102049 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5789473684 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52631578947 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386659660044 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130780454482 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129902369957 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202856814404 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972029176092 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92291220557 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54941938075 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503211991435 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2509102049 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5789473684 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52631578947 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386659660044 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130780454482 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129902369957 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202856814404 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972029176092 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.