Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
A leader becomes successful during his period through the effective decisions that he takes for the betterment and welfare of his country's people. However, it does
not mean that the vital decisions that are taken by him should always favor the people. But it is highly important that are very moralistic. I strongly believe that more importance should be given on maintaining the moral of the judgement even if it is at the cost of the respect of his peers.
Leadership qualities are not only about leading and guiding the fellow members of any team, but it is also about a person's ability to take vital decisions at tough situations without going against the moral. This can be well demonstrated with a recent incident that took place. A man from a tribal background was taken into custody by the police of India for an investigation. The person was believed to have stolen a huge amount of money from a politician's house. Even though there was not adequate evidence for the police to prove him guilty, it was the ultimate influence of the powerful politician that made the police to beat him to death. This news became very viral as the man was really innocent and he was not related to the crime in any way. This issue was taken up by the political leader of the party to which that particular politician belonged to. Despite the fact that the politician was an important part of his party. Just because to give a moralist decision as a form of respect given to the innocent man's life who had died for no reason, the politician had decided to take a sound decision to remove that particular politician from his party and take away all his powers and also filled a case against him.
The above stated real-life example is a perfect way to demonstrate how a leader should act in situations where his decisions have to be moralistic even if his own peers are affected from it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The result is an increase in assaults property damage and disruptions of 70
- Unexamined Conservatism is far more dangerous than reckless change 58
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider ways in which the statement might or mig 16
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 66
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ers of any team, but it is also about a persons ability to take vital decisions at toug...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62686567164 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52663247948 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534328358209 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1483514093 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19778116954 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702550394919 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687071150992 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129365282248 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236649204126 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.