A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
It has always been discussed if there should be create a national curriculum that standardize the teaching process and scope of an entire nation. However, this possibility can be of greater harm than good. There should not be a national standard curriculum due to the possibility to become a powerful tool of government manipulation and also create constrains on the capacity to adaptations of needs and constrains of a specific classroom.
First of all, a national curriculum could provide a mechanism to led students into beliving a specific perspective dictated by a committee. Before defining the curriculum itself, there would be need to create a committee to write this standard, which mostly would be put together by the government of the nation. On that matter, it would give the administration the possibility to define the boundaries of how and what would be taugth inside classrooms throughout the country. This is specially dangerous on countries where the leaders have a very biased opinions. For instance, in a country led by a dictator, the curriculum could erase the reports of what the opposition has done in the History of that nation and propose an approach where all the actions instituted by the government are for the greater good of that country. That would develop students that believe in a specific point-of-view and have little to no aware of what really happened, harming the critical sense. Therefore, a national curriculum could become a tool to mold the masses into a shape that fits personal interests.
In addition to that, a fixed national curriculum lack the capacity to be adaptable into the students needs and constrains. Proposing a standardization of the teaching scope would be efficient if all the students had a standard learning process, which is known not to be true. Learning capabilities differ among students and a more personal approach is required in some cases to create an environment where the kids and teenagers can excel. Thus, teachers on the classrom should have the permission to adapt whats is being taught to fulfill - and most specifically how it is done - to the needs of the group of learners. For example, if a class have a better development when watching movies about a historic subject, that can become the method applied by the teachers to introduce an event and develop upon that. The national curriculum could have an approach that would not work. Therefore, personal liberties to the professional involved with the students is of great importance - and that would be hindered by a national curriculum.
In summary, a national curriculum should not be adopted by a nation. It could create a tool to define what is being taught and how it is being transferred to the students and would prevent possible adaptation to the needs of classes that can only be perceived by professional that deal with that specific group on a daily basis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers 50
- The city of Winston has two large department stores Namen and Roscoe Namen is known for its high end designer fashions while Roscoe is known for more affordable fashion options Both Namen and Roscoe are each considering opening another store in the growin 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'created'?
Suggestion: created
...lways been discussed if there should be create a national curriculum that standardize ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opinion'?
Suggestion: opinion
...es where the leaders have a very biased opinions. For instance, in a country led by a di...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reports of what the opposition has done in the History of that nation and propos...
^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...rom should have the permission to adapt whats is being taught to fulfill - and most s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04149377593 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93037787066 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43153526971 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6981350846 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.894736842 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3684210526 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226983859227 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991648832437 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901618024222 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169032644228 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129373045718 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'created'?
Suggestion: created
...lways been discussed if there should be create a national curriculum that standardize ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opinion'?
Suggestion: opinion
...es where the leaders have a very biased opinions. For instance, in a country led by a di...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reports of what the opposition has done in the History of that nation and propos...
^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...rom should have the permission to adapt whats is being taught to fulfill - and most s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04149377593 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93037787066 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43153526971 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6981350846 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.894736842 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3684210526 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226983859227 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991648832437 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901618024222 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169032644228 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129373045718 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.