The linegraph llustrates the quantity of foreign tourists to the coast, the mountains, and the lakes in a particular country over the period of 20 years.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the number of overseas travelers to 3 kinds of natural landscapes grew up relatively during the years shown. In addition, the people who visited the coast was higher than those two left areas, except for the year 2002.
In 1987, the coast had by far the most visitors about 4 thousands, which was twice as much as the number of people coming to the mountains and 4 times higher than the tourists come to the lakes. From 1987 to 1992, the number of people traveling to the coast witnessed a slight plunge while the lakes visitors increased double. The number of guys who visited the mountains increased slightly before decreasing and reaching the same number of people traveling to the lakes.
From 1992 to 2007, number of the travelers to the coast still rose up until reaching a peak of 75k people in 2007. The number of people coming to the mountains fluctuated slightly and went up to over 35k. However, it still had the lowest visitors comparing the the other two.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 56
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 67
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 78
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...still had the lowest visitors comparing the the other two.
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...still had the lowest visitors comparing the the other two.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, still, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68780487805 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40397252036 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517073170732 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9221356099 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148259356069 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656998847361 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350579730933 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829982228268 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407616397749 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.