Nowadays in many countries, young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. Is it a positive or negative development?
Youth leaving their villages for schooling and employment in urban areas has become a trend in numerous nations, these days. In this essay, I shall discuss the aforementioned movement and explain why it is a good shift.
To commence with, the reasons for the popularity of this trend are manifold yet, the first and foremost one to be noted is that the cosmopolitans offer more job opportunities. To explicate, various multinational corporations set up their companies in big cities such as Bengaluru, Gurgaon, etc. because of the infrastructure available there. This attracts a lot of people to move closer to them. Furthermore, taking education into consideration, schools in these metropolitans are facilitated with advanced equipment for learning providing students with visualized and practical approach in their subjects which is not possible in rural areas, yet. For instance, recent surveys have shown that children who studied in cities acquired more knowledge about the domains in their curriculum than the pupils in villages. Hence, all these causes make urban areas an ideal place to live.
However, there are some benefits of staying back in their native hometowns as well. Firstly, one gets to stay with his family and friends with whom they share a priceless bond. Generally, it is not easy to move the entire family to urban area due to financial constraints and therefore, many individuals just live with their families rather than moving to cities. Secondly, the environment in the villages is cleaner compared to the polluted cosmopolitans. The water and air in the countryside are pure, free of any chemicals. Although these interests might matter to a small portion of the population but the life in metropolitans is more fulfilling.
In conclusion, after contemplating the rendered arguments, I opine that urbanization being trend is a positive development though it has a few drawbacks, but these can be overcome provided people work together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-03 | Iqreet Kaur | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | Rajan khehra | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | eyraen | 93 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 89
- Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities Is it a positive or negative development 89
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think that economic progress is the only way to measure a country s success while others think that there are other factors which can be used to measure a country s success What are these factors And among them which one is more important than 73
- Some experts believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to provide'.
Suggestion: to provide
...ed with advanced equipment for learning providing students with visualized and practical ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31309904153 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03460899947 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645367412141 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2682374884 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121390551503 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299804400934 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036063990502 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728241660743 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346138535453 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to provide'.
Suggestion: to provide
...ed with advanced equipment for learning providing students with visualized and practical ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31309904153 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03460899947 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645367412141 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2682374884 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121390551503 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299804400934 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036063990502 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728241660743 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346138535453 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.