The pie charts compare different languages in addition to English spoken by British students at one university in England in the years 2000 and 2010.
Overall, German was the least popular language in both years, while a vast majority of students were able to speak Spanish. The proportion for all languages showed only a minimal change in a decade.
As can be seen from the chart, in both years, the proportion of German speakers remained constant at 10%, making it the lowest among all. However, changes could be seen in other languages, with the population of students who spoke only English and didn’t know any other languages showing a decrease from 20% in 2000 to just only 10% in 2010. Moreover, the percentage of people who were good at French had also declined by 5% over a 10-year period.
By contrast, the rise of the same percentage could be seen in Spanish speakers, from 30% to 35%, making it the most spoken language of all other than English. There were also 5% growths in people who could communicate in another language and those who were proficient in two other languages.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld be seen in Spanish speakers, from 30% to 35%, making it the most spoken langua...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48401538038 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573684210526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1386219992 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361551282772 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154848619955 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937243113276 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234209370791 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904890870249 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.